<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti Web 2.0 Manifesto</title>
	<link>http://placeofsocialmedia.com/blog/2007/04/30/anti-web-20-manifesto/</link>
	<description>How Networks Think Globally and Act Locally</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Kiran Bettadapur</title>
		<link>http://placeofsocialmedia.com/blog/2007/04/30/anti-web-20-manifesto/#comment-20</link>
		<author>Kiran Bettadapur</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 19:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://placeofsocialmedia.com/blog/2007/04/30/anti-web-20-manifesto/#comment-20</guid>
					<description>I am indeed shocked by Andrew Keen's myopic arguments. 

He forgets that how creative a culture gets in a walk-of-life is directly proportional to the activity - of both creator(s) and consumer(s) - in that walk-of-life. In fact, one feeds off the other. The exposure to an increased volume of creative output (or input to the consumer) actually enhances popular "taste."

Disclaimer: I have co-founded Cylive - a "social publishing and content management company"
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am indeed shocked by Andrew Keen&#8217;s myopic arguments. </p>
<p>He forgets that how creative a culture gets in a walk-of-life is directly proportional to the activity - of both creator(s) and consumer(s) - in that walk-of-life. In fact, one feeds off the other. The exposure to an increased volume of creative output (or input to the consumer) actually enhances popular &#8220;taste.&#8221;</p>
<p>Disclaimer: I have co-founded Cylive - a &#8220;social publishing and content management company&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
